Whatsapp 93125-11015 For Details

Daily Current Affairs for UPSC Exam

4Dec
2024

Top UN Court Hears Landmark Climate Change Case (GS Paper 2, Polity)

Top UN Court Hears Landmark Climate Change Case (GS Paper 2, Polity)

Overview:

  • The International Court of Justice (ICJ) is currently hearing a landmark case that could set a major precedent regarding the legal responsibilities of nations to combat climate change.
  • This case, initiated by the small island nation of Vanuatu, seeks an advisory opinion from the ICJ on the global obligations of countries in addressing climate change.
  • The hearings began on December 2, 2024, and are scheduled to last for two weeks.

 

Vanuatu’s Role:

  • Vanuatu is leading the charge in this critical case, presenting the first set of arguments to clarify the legal responsibilities of countries in tackling climate change.
  • The nation, which faces the most immediate and severe impacts of climate change, has called for international acknowledgment of the urgent legal obligations countries have in mitigating the crisis.
  • This case underscores the vulnerability of small island nations, many of which are facing rising sea levels, extreme weather events, and other catastrophic impacts of climate change.
  • Vanuatu's initiative is a direct response to the existential threat that these countries face, seeking legal clarity and accountability for nations contributing most to global warming.

 

Importance of Advisory Opinions:

  • While advisory opinions from the ICJ are not legally binding, they carry significant moral and legal weight.
  • They have the power to influence international law and shape the rulings of national courts in future climate-related cases.
  • Legal experts predict that the ICJ's opinion in this case will play a crucial role in shaping global climate litigation, potentially setting new standards for how nations are held accountable for their environmental responsibilities.

 

Context of Recent Climate Agreements:

  • The ICJ hearings come on the heels of COP29, where developing countries criticized the climate finance pledge made by developed nations.
  • The pledge promises $300 billion annually by 2035, but many developing nations have deemed this amount insufficient given the urgent needs of vulnerable countries.
  • These countries argue that this amount does not adequately address the financial gap required for adapting to and mitigating the impacts of climate change.

 

Key Arguments Presented:

Ralph Regenvanu, Vanuatu's climate envoy, has presented several key arguments during the case:

    • The phasing out of fossil fuels should be an essential priority to prevent further climate damage.
    • Financial support for nations disproportionately impacted by climate change should be significantly increased.
    • Countries responsible for historical emissions that have contributed to climate damage should be held accountable and their actions should be deemed illegal under international law.

 

Participation of Major Emitters:

The case has also drawn input from some of the world’s major greenhouse gas emitters, including:

  • The United States
  • China
  • The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC)

Their participation highlights the global stakes involved in this case, as it addresses the responsibilities of the largest contributors to global warming and their role in the ongoing climate crisis.

 

Timeline:

  • The ICJ hearings will continue until December 13, 2024, with the court’s advisory opinion expected to be delivered sometime in 2025.
  • The extended timeline reflects the complexity and magnitude of addressing the legal and environmental issues surrounding climate change, which have far-reaching implications for international law and policy.

 

Conclusion:

  • This landmark case before the ICJ is a crucial development in the global fight against climate change.
  • The outcome of these hearings could significantly influence how international law evolves to address the legal responsibilities of nations in mitigating climate change, especially for vulnerable countries like Vanuatu.
  • The decision may also set a precedent for future climate-related litigation, ensuring that countries most responsible for climate damage are held accountable for their actions.